57 | 0 | 267 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
基于《中国日报》近10年来关于平潭的报道,构建了小型语料库,运用AntConc4.2.0和Coh-Metrix工具,结合Fairclough的三维话语分析框架,从文本分析、话语实践和社会实践三个维度,探讨平潭城市国际形象中的话语构建过程。研究发现:平潭的国际形象传播逐渐转向数字化平台,凸显新媒体的重要性;政府发言主导了国际形象的塑造,强化了官方话语在国际传播中的主导地位;受众反馈显示,网络信息与实际传播之间存在一定脱节,表明话语实践中面临一定的挑战;当前传播内容主要集中于自然景观与政府项目推介,较少回应国际游客的文化、社会及心理需求。研究揭示了平潭国际形象传播中的机遇与不足,为进一步提升其全球知名度提供了建议。
Abstract:Based on a small corpus constructed from China Daily's reports on Pingtan over the past decade, this study explores the discourse construction process in the international image of Pingtan city from the three dimensions of text analysis, discourse practice and social practice by employing AntConc 4.2.0 and Coh-Metrix tools, and combining with Fairclough's three-dimensional discourse analysis framework. The research findings are as follows: The dissemination of Pingtan's international image has gradually shifted to digital platforms, highlighting the importance of new media; Government statements dominate the shaping of the international image, reinforcing the leading role of official discourse in international communication; Audience feedback indicates a disconnection between online information and actual dissemination, suggesting certain challenges in discourse practice; Current communication content primarily focuses on natural landscapes and government project promotion, with limited attention given to international tourists' cultural, social, and psychological needs. The study reveals both opportunities and shortcomings in Pingtan's international image dissemination, providing suggestions for further enhancing its global recognition.
[1]LYNCH K.The Image of the City[M].Cambridge MA:MIT Press,1960:1.
[2]唐磊.深圳国际城市形象:域外“专家意见”与“大众感知”[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020(2):41-49.
[3]于赫.自贸港建设背景下海口市国际形象塑造及传播探析[J].传媒,2023(12):63-65.
[4]尹铂淳.基于大型语料库的长沙国际形象及其自塑策略研究[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(4):177-181.
[5]韩瑞霞.城市国际形象全球公众评价差异的媒介影响机制:以“上海文化”为例[J].新闻大学,2023(3):90-103,122-123.
[6]FAIRCLOUGH N.Discourse and Social Change[M].Oxford:Polity Press,1992:89.
[7]CAPPELLI G.Sun,Sea,Sex and the Unspoilt Countryside:How the English Language Makes Tourists out of Readers [M].Pari:Pari Publishing,2006.
[8]THURLOW C,JAWORSKI A.Tourism Discourse:Language and Global Mobility [M].Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan,2010.
[9]田海龙.旅游研究的语篇视角[J].南京社会科学,2009(8):124-128.
[10]田海龙.旅游话语研究:理论与实践[M].北京:外文出版社,2012.
[11]冯捷蕴,皇甫俊凯.故宫旅游形象的新媒体研究[J].现代传播,2017(5):137-143.
[12]何文贤,徐品晶.论“海丝核心区”福建形象传播力的提升:基于语境顺应的方法论视角[J].中共福建省委党校(福建行政学院)学报,2021(5):153-160.
[13]尚京京,李秋杨.天津城市形象的媒体话语建构[J].现代语言学,2022(10):1736-1745.
[14]黄雅君.海外英文媒体中的泉州形象:基于语料库的批评话语分析[J].福建技术师范学院学报,2022(1):73-81.
[15]FAIRCLOUGH N,WODAK R.Critical discourse analysis [C]//In T.Van Dijk(ed.).Discourse as Social Interaction.Discourse Studies:A Multidisciplinary Introduction.London:Sage,1997:258-284.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19977/j.cnki.jfpnu.20250015
中图分类号:D827;D609;G212
引用信息:
[1]肖晶.平潭城市国际形象话语建构研究[J].福建技术师范学院学报,2025,43(01):109-116+125.DOI:10.19977/j.cnki.jfpnu.20250015.
基金信息:
福建省教育厅中青年教师教育科研项目(JAS20223); 校级课题(KY2023FS10)